Thanks - Its a shame the wiki and the blog are not a little more integrated. Perhaps feeds can be set up from each cross referencing each other.

 out of  found this valuable. Do you find this valuable?    

Hi Chris, the CLIWG will be re-inventing this wiki as one for 'good practice in communication' , ie taking it away from the one-event item and turning it into a more permanent 'database'. So yes, I think we should certainly continue to use this wiki in order to bring the liaison community together along with the conference events, the institutional visits, the videoconferencing of meetings etc etc - the more ways we can communicate the better!

 out of  found this valuable. Do you find this valuable?    

I have been trying to use both facebook and wikis recently for colloborative work with small groups that I'm involved in. Facebook is fun and feels ok for short sharp communications but is not good enough for collaborative work involving sharing materials and documents. And there is far too much "noise" from all the social networking stuff. This wiki seems to offer far more potential.

 out of  found this valuable. Do you find this valuable?    

Yes the newsletters work because they are tight to the point and relevent to the audience at the Insitute. I will keep it in the back of my mind to see if there anything that may work.

 out of  found this valuable. Do you find this valuable?    

I'm the Marketing Manager for Oxford University Computing Services (OUCS), which includes all aspects of communications, marketing, publicity, etc. of our services and events to the rest of the University.

It's a new post, created in Feb 2006. I work 3 days a week - and that's fine. However, I don't /do/ everything and I certainly do not write all our webpages! A lot of my time is spent on co-ordination and advising people on the best way to get their message to the right audience, making sure the OUCS logo and URL's appear appropriately on everything and keeping the information flowing through our established channels (RSS feeds, newsletters, reports to committees, etc). I've written a number of web pages to describe a communications strategy, how to approach advertising, resources available, etc. I doubt many people read them but I find it handy to refer people to and so its not all just in my head.

We did used to have separate bits of paper produced by different sections and different times. It took a while to get established but now most are very happy to co-ordinate with (read: dump all the work on) me.

I work closely with our Information Services Section who look after the website. Anyone within the department can add web pages but between ISS and myself we check things are the right style, right place, right info, etc. Writing style and jargon is tricky but I will ask for clarification or suggest changes if needed. Techy people often seem to overlook the simple things - what is the service and why would I be interested in it? - in their enthusiasm.

Branding is a real issue. We have some great designers here who like to be creative. It can be hard to persuade them that they have to use the established logo or webstyle instead of their lovely new creation.

Jane

 out of  found this valuable. Do you find this valuable?